Welcome to the RSL Cup blog

I've been a fan of Real Salt Lake since it joined MLS and took to the field in 2005, and I've been a fan of MLS since it began in 1996. Lately however I've started to worry about the path MLS is taking and the poor decisions they are making that in my mind threaten the growth of soccer as a whole in the US. (see "Columbus conspiracy" section) Soccer in America will grow only when we have a vibrant and diverse minor league system, something that MLS seems to be smothering at the moment. (see "American soccer wars" section) Let's keep our eyes on the situation and hope for the best, a future where grass-roots soccer and the minor leagues can not only exist but flourish, as well as where the contributions and history of the league's early clubs are appreciated and preserved.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

The dangers of playing soccer,

getting someone's pinky shoved in your mouth.

Monday, October 17, 2016

The Future Of US Club Soccer At A Crossroads: Part Two – How NASL Can Overhaul Its Value Proposition & Bring Promotion & Relegation To US Soccer

(by Chris Kivlehan midfieldpress.com 9-16)
Fair warning: This is a promotion and relegation article.  As such, it will not be for many readers.  If you find discussion on the topic of promotion and relegation upsetting, for the sake of your blood pressure, turn back now.  All others, proceed.
Let’s get this out of the way:  Promotion and relegation with Major League Soccer isn’t happening.  MLS investors have too much to lose, and they are strongly aligned against it. So much so, that they want you to think that you don’t want promotion and relegation, either.  Their position was made abundantly clear by New England’s Jonathan Kraft, Seattle’s Joe Roth and MLS commissioner Don Garber at BlazerCon last year, as quoted in Part One of this article.  

Before MLS partnered with the United Soccer League to create a system where USL teams could affiliate with MLS teams, MLS and the North American Soccer League were discussing such a partnership between the nation’s first and second divisions.  Kartik Krishnaiyer, who was the NASL’s communications director during that period, shared with the Two United Fans Podcast (14:30-18:00 marks) details on how the New York Cosmos’ entry into NASL influenced the league away from an affiliation path and onto an independent course with an eye towards competing with MLS in the future.  Once turned down by NASL, MLS took the partnership offer to third division USL.

In the years since, USL’s close relationship with MLS has allowed it to attract a greater number of new franchises than NASL, due to the reduced costs of operating a USL team.  Granted, some of these new franchises are MLS reserve teams.  These reduced costs are driven by lower travel expenses due to regionalized conferences and operational resources provided by MLS teams to their USL affiliates.   Several investors with MLS ambitions have launched USL clubs to demonstrate their market’s suitability for MLS.  Now that USL is potentially on the verge of being sanctioned as a second division league by the United States Soccer Federation, NASL’s position in the US soccer pyramid is in jeopardy.  MLS and USL are developing a closed system similar to Major League Baseball and Minor League Baseball, and there is no place for NASL in that system.

Here in Part Two, we will explore a vision for an alternative soccer pyramid structure that the North American Soccer League could create in conjunction with teams from lower level leagues like the National Premier Soccer League (NPSL), American Soccer League (ASL), Premier League of America (PLA) and United Premier Soccer League (UPSL) to compete against the MLS-USL system.  Perhaps even some teams from USL’s Premier Development League (PDL) could jump ship, as club movement between NPSL and PDL has been relatively commonplace.  The NASL already has a working relationship with NPSL that sees many clubs playing their reserve teams in NPSL, similar to how MLS reserve teams compete in USL.

Differentiate, Or Die

To date, NASL has attempted to differentiate itself from MLS by allowing its clubs more freedom over their rosters, brands and revenue generation activities.  With a 15 year head start, MLS outpaces the relatively new NASL in every measure of success.  Meanwhile, USL has differentiated itself from NASL by providing team owners with a minor league model that reduces operating costs and the unspoken promise that its cozy relationship with MLS could help an USL investor jump his team to the big league in a few years.  NASL’s current differentiators are not sufficient to drive it to success in the marketplace.  It is being squeezed from the top by MLS, and the bottom by USL.

In order for NASL to change that status quo, it needs to give more reasons for people to watch it rather than, or in addition to, MLS.  It needs to give owners a reason to join it, rather than USL.  MLS aims to be the best American style sports league that plays soccer, or the NFL of soccer.  USL aims to be the best minor league supporting MLS.  NASL should aim to create the best global style soccer pyramid in North America, and that means building up to a point where promotion and relegation can be incorporated into the league structure.

NASL has interest in promotion and relegation, per commissioner Bill Peterson on the Cosmos Country Podcast recently: “We are looking for some people to join the discussion with us.  And we’ve started that.  We have some people that are thinking this through.  What I was looking for is: can we put some thought into how it might work, rather than why it won’t work?”

The North American Soccer League is not ready for promotion and relegation today, especially if MLS and USL teams are not going to be in the mix.  There need to be more viable teams that can meet first and second division standards.  However NASL can lay the groundwork for promotion and relegation in the future.

Another area where NASL could differentiate itself from MLS would be in embracing supporter ownership in teams.  MLS’s single entity model prevents supporters from owning shares in their franchises.  The Chicago NASL group seeks to establish a Supporters Trust that owns 10% of the club.  Seattle’s USL reserve team has a Supporters Trust that owns a 20% stake. Nashville FC was a supporter owned club in NPSL, but supporter ownership will drop to 1% in the USL franchise.  Supporters Trusts own clubs around the world, however US Soccer discourages this model with the ownership requirements in its division standards.   Providing equity to a supporters trust and literally making them owners in their club could help drive community engagement with the team.  While NASL does not dictate a specific ownership structure to its clubs, it could encourage having some element of supporter ownership as a best practice.

If the classic NASL of 1968-84 was NASL 1.0 and today’s league is NASL 2.0, these changes would represent an evolution into NASL 3.0.  But before we get started on what a NASL 3.0 could look like, there is some fundamental work to do around standards and best practices for clubs before the league is ready to go there.

Solidify The Core

One of NASL’s drawbacks is that it appears to be a less stable league than MLS and USL.  Partially this is inherent to its decision to go its own way from the MLS-USL system.  It is embarking on a road less traveled, and there are going to be bumps in that road. The league’s legal action against USSF is reported to have scared off at least one investor, in a potential Orange County team.   A continuous trickle of rumors that teams may leave or fold is bad for the perception of the league’s stability.  While Minnesota United leaving for MLS rather than facing in-market competition from a Minnesota Vikings-owned MLS team is an understandable situation, rumors of clubs leaving for USL is damaging.

NASL needs to make certain it has a core group of solid clubs that are committed to the league’s vision.  The New York Cosmos, Tampa Bay Rowdies, Carolina Railhawks, Indy Eleven, Jacksonville Armada, Miami FC and the San Francisco Deltas can give the league seven solid organizations based in the continental United States to build around, as long as they are committed long term.  The Chicago NASL group can soon join that list.  If the owners of these clubs are united in their commitment to a common NASL vision, the league will have a strong foundation to build from.  However if several of these teams start leaving for USL, the league may fall apart before it can realize its vision.  NASL would do better to have any uncommitted clubs from that group leave sooner rather than later, so it can identify who its core teams are and align together from there.

If a strong core group sticks together, it will be less important if the teams on the fringes leave or fail.  The Ottawa Fury are said to be looking at a switch to USL to reduce their expenses.  Both Canadian clubs are linked with a potential move to a domestic league.  While Puerto Rico FC is off to a nice start, it has a single owner and large travel expenses. While they have been a fun addition to the league this year, it is hard to see Puerto Rico being sustainable long term.  Fort Lauderdale has reportedly had issues paying its players and staff on time, and its attendance has fallen off a cliff this season.  Rayo OKC… well that is a whole other story.

Oklahoma City And How Not To Grow

In July 2013, the North American Soccer League announced that Oklahoma City was awarded an expansion team.  The club was to be called Oklahoma City FC, and it was scheduled to start play in 2015.  However, OKCFC fizzled out before it ever got going as a NASL team, because investor Tim McLaughlin bailed on the NASL bid to join up with a newly announced USL bid that would become the OKC Energy.  McLaughlin took the club’s lease of Taft Stadium with him, and the USL team beat NASL to the market even though it announced later.  NASL ultimately sued and settled with McLaughlin, but the other investors, including Sold Out Strategies, kept working behind the scenes to bring NASL to OKC.

In November 2015, Sold Out Strategies would re-emerge with Spanish club Rayo Vallecano and Sean Jones as investors to bring Rayo OKC to NASL in 2016.  The team was announced with only 5 months to go before the season.  Skeptics who thought Rayo OKC might be a rush job were somewhat pacified when the club announced NASL veteran manager Alen Marcina as its skipper.  Marcina had been the manager of the late San Antonio Scorpions, and led that club to a Soccer Bowl championship in 2014.

Rayo further lulled skeptics into a sense of greater confidence with some impressive signings.  Quality NASL veterans Billy Forbes and Richard Menjivar joined the club, as did former MLS players such as Michel and ex-USMNT striker Robbie Findley.  The capstone was the signing of Giorgios Samaras, giving Rayo a true international star.

The team offset its choice to play at a high school football stadium by using Nexxfield turf, which covered up football lines and made the field look good, at least to TV audiences.  The opening match drew strong attendance and Rayo OKC continued with respectable crowds throughout the Spring Season.  The experiment of having both a NASL and USL team in OKC seemed to be going okay.
Then Rayo Vallecano got relegated from La Liga.  After weeks of uncertainty, the majority ownership in Spain made a series of moves that resulted in Marcina and Sold Out Strategies leaving the club.  The front office is reportedly a skeleton crew, an operation seemingly designed to see out the season and minimize losses along the way. The first home match after these moves, on August 20th, was barely attended.

Rayo OKC debuted only 5 months after it was announced, with a foreign-based majority owner and a colony club brand, entering a market already occupied by a USL team.  This is not a good model for an expansion team going forward.

The San Francisco Deltas And A Better Model For The Future

Like Rayo OKC, the San Francisco Deltas were met with skepticism when they were announced.  Many people doubt San Francisco’s desire to support a lower league soccer team.  The organization made a few initial moves in humor that caught a lower league US club soccer fandom that sometimes takes itself too seriously off balance. When the Deltas’ name and logo were unveiled, the reaction was generally negative.

It was not until the club’s owner, Brian Andres Helmick, started sharing his vision for bringing soccer to San Francisco that perceptions started to change.  Securing Kezar Stadium, getting permission to sell alcohol there, and investing in improvements in the facility helped show they were serious.  Landing respected manager Marc Dos Santos, who led the Ottawa Fury to the Soccer Bowl last year, has a once wary NASL fan base enthusiastic about the Deltas.  The group’s contest for season ticket holders to vote on the home kit exemplifies how they are engaging the fan base from the start.

In contrast with Rayo OKC, the Deltas seem a well-prepared operation.  Helmick carefully researched how to set his new business venture up for success in advance of launching the club. “I met with every single team owner, president and GM to understand their vision, them as people, mistakes that they made so we could get some best practices from them,” Helmick explained to Midfield Press. “I sat with Peter Wilt and went through, month-by-month and step-by-step, how he built Indy Eleven’s success.”

While Helmick’s research into the best practices of NASL team’s is admirable, the league should have best practices for operating a successful franchise documented and ready to hand out to an owner like Helmick as a recipe for success.  How to attract sponsors, fostering the growth of supporters groups, how to engage community leaders, how to drive season ticket sales and attendances to matches and how to line up local media coverage are common needs that teams should work together to perfect.  You don’t have to be a single entity league to have a common set of operating standards.  As the NPSL’s slogan says, “We compete for 90 minutes on the field… we are business partners always.”  The Cosmos are better off when the Rowdies are a well-run business operation, and vice-versa.  An important step for the league would be to create these shared best practices to benefit all members.

With that out of the way, let’s follow Bill Peterson’s suggestion and imagine how promotion and relegation involving NASL could work, rather than focusing on reasons why it won’t happen.

Pro/Rel Phase 0: Managing Expectations & Gaining Alignment

After codifying shared best practices and making sure all teams within the league live up to certain minimum standards related to them, the first thing NASL would need to do to go down the promotion and relegation path is make sure that the large majority of its owners are on board with it, and set expectations for future owners that pro/rel is coming.  While not 100% necessary, ideally the league’s Board of Governors would also align around other related issues like there being no metro market territory rights that would keep another club from springing up in your market.  

NASL would need to find another way to drive up revenues rather than large expansion fees, because owners who have paid large entry fees would be reluctant to go along with pro/rel. The league has not charged the large expansion fees that we have seen from MLS, but NASL expansion fees do seem to be going up.   The rumored expansion fee for Chicago is $10 million.  Previous to that, NASL expansion fees have been reported in the $3 million region.  Even if the Chicago fee report is true, NASL is still far away from MLS’s expansion fees, which are reportedly headed over $200M in the near future.  However, if the league plans on hiking up expansion fees along the way as MLS has done, it will undermine the potential to implement promotion and relegation.   Setting a standard expansion fee that grows annually at a rate adjusted for inflation and exploring alternative ways for the league to grow revenues necessary to support its operations would keep the system primed for pro/rel.  Since NASL is inherently more decentralized than MLS, it should not need as much funding to support league operations.

Pro/Rel Phase 1:  Expansion To 24 Teams And The Creation Of An Incubator League

Fall 2016 sees NASL with 12 teams.  San Francisco Deltas will join in Spring 2017, offsetting the departure of Minnesota United FC to MLS. Chicago will join likely NASL in 2018.  Reports suggest that Ottawa could be leaving NASL for USL or a Canadian Premier League, though Edmonton is said to be staying in NASL. Netting this out, you have two teams likely on the way in and two teams likely on the way out, meaning the league presently looks like it will have 12 teams for Spring 2018.  This is before factoring in the uncertain future for Rayo OKC or the six potential expansion groups that Bill Peterson has spoken of that could have a 2017 or 2018 start.

Until NASL expands to 24 teams, promotion and relegation is a non-starter.  There simply are not enough teams to create two divisions with pro/rel between them.  However, creating a second NASL division without promotion to NASL1 makes sense as a way to get there.  At the start, NASL2 would serve as an incubator for promising lower level clubs.

A regionalized NASL2 would offer an expansion alternative to cost-conscious investors opting for USL today.  USL’s two main advantages to investors are lower travel expenses and the potential of affiliations with MLS teams reducing operating costs.  NASL can replicate one of those with this model, while offering its selling point of greater freedom over club operations and a first division future. Prior to Nashville’s USL announcement, lower operating costs were cited by Nashville FC’s Chris Jones and FC Tucson’s Rick Schantz as reasons why USL would be a more realistic next move for their NPSL and PDL clubs, respectively.

There are several other ambitious amateur and semi-pro teams in the NPSL and similar leagues that may look to move up to the professional ranks. NASL2 could double as an “NPSL Pro” division. FC Buffalo, Detroit City FC, Grand Rapids FC and Chattanooga FC are among the clubs playing in quality markets and drawing respectable crowds on a regular basis ranging from 1000-4000.  Several of these teams are outdrawing NASL sides regularly.  NASL should work with these clubs to create NASL2 at a professional standard below the USSF’s third division rules. Division three rules would be challenge for these clubs to meet since they require an owner with a net worth of $10 million and none of those clubs are likely to have that.  A pro league that sits below D3 standards and above the NPSL/PDL level (formally or informally) would represent a step up in quality for these teams, and allow them to continue developing their operations with an eye towards a further step up in the future.  Presently there is no official fourth tier of US soccer, with NPSL and PDL acting as defacto fourth tiers.  NASL could petition USSF to make NASL2 the official fourth tier, allowing the clubs in it to earn automatic entry into the US Open Cup.

NASL would need to provide these clubs help with the best practices described above, as well as investor connections to support their further growth. To start, NASL could follow MLS-USL’s example and put NASL reserve teams in the league with these clubs to help regionalize NASL2 and minimize travel costs to clubs, while providing better competition to the NASL reserves than they get in NPSL today.   As NASL1 and NASL2 grow over time, the reserve sides can drop down another tier.
  • An NASL2 North division might start off consisting of Cosmos B, Indy NPSL, Chicago 2 and then FC Buffalo, Grand Rapids FC, Detroit City FC, AFC Cleveland, Boston City FC, the Kingston Stockade and the Milwaukee Torrent.  The Philadelphia Fury from ASL could potentially join up, as could any other strong clubs that might exist in the American Soccer League and Premier League of America.  NASL could get more aggressive than it is today in recruiting investors in target cities like Hartford, Providence and Baltimore to potentially join in the future.
  • An NASL2 South division might consist of Rowdies 2, Strikers U-23, Armada U-23, Railhawks U-23 as well as Memphis City FC, Chattanooga FC, Tulsa Athletics, Virginia Beach City FC and the NPSL Atlanta Silverbacks.  Teams in New Orleans, Birmingham and Texas could join later.
  • A western division could be added down the road. The Deltas’ reserves and the B sides of any soon to be announced Western NASL expansion clubs could anchor the league. Clubs from the NPSL, like the East Bay Stompers and North County Battalion, and the United Premier Soccer League, like the L.A. Wolves, La Maquina and Cal FC could be interested. Successful PDL clubs like Fresno, Ventura County, Tucson and Albuquerque could be options as well.
NASL2 would function as a bridge between NASL and the NPSL for those clubs that may be ready for a higher level than the NPSL or PDL can offer, but are not yet ready to be held to the USSF’s D2 or D3 standards.  During this initial phase there would be no automatic promotion from NASL2 to NASL1, nor would there be from NPSL to NASL2.  However playing in a higher profile competition like NASL2 could help those clubs attract investment to be able to afford the inflation-fixed expansion fee to join NASL1 ahead of promotion and relegation being implemented. The most critical success factor in this phase will be NASL providing good support to these organizations to help them sustain themselves at a pro level.  This phase would last something like a decade, give or take a few years.

 Pro/Rel Phase 2:  The Introduction Of Limited Promotion & Relegation

Once there is a strong NASL1 with 20-24 teams and a vibrant NASL2 with 12 or so independent teams able to meet USSF Division One or Two standards, NASL1 and NASL2 could be split into two divisions of 16-18 teams with three promotion and relegation slots between them.  NASL2 would be split into two regional conferences, the winners of each conference winning automatic promotion and the bottom two in NASL1 getting relegated.  The second best teams in each conference would play to face the third worst team in NASL1 for a relegation playoff.

A newly created NASL3 would take on the incubator role without automatic promotion to NASL2.  Reserve teams move to NASL3, which is aligned in four regional divisions.  At this point NASL1 should meet D1 standards, NASL2 should meet D2 or D3 standards and NASL3 should fit in that new professional D4 standard mentioned above.  The league might require teams in NASL2 to pay something like the inflation-fixed expansion fee to participate in promotion and relegation at this phase, or otherwise continue playing in NASL3.

Pro/Rel Phase 3: Connecting The Lower Divisions

The final phase of the process would see the NASL pyramid formally connect with NPSL to allow promotion, with conditions, into the NASL system.  Promoted teams must be able to meet the D4 standards of NASL3 and pay an expansion fee appropriate to that level if it is their first time entering the NASL system.

The completion of this process would mean that someone could start a team in the NPSL and climb their way up to the NASL Premier division over time, just as clubs in England can fight their way up the pyramid while building up their club over a period of years.

It also provides something of a safety net that allows upper league clubs that hit hard times to drop down a few levels without going completely under.  If Ottawa or Fort Lauderdale were looking to reduce costs due to financial losses, they could stay within the NASL system and move to NASL2 rather than switch to a lower cost, competing league system.  When they recover, find new investors or new revenue streams, those clubs could make a run at promotion back to NASL1.
The final resulting NASL system might look something like this:
  • NASL Premier as a national 20-team division at the top of the pyramid. Maybe it is still split into Spring and Fall seasons, maybe not.  Regardless, the single table would determine relegation to the NASL2. There would be two automatic relegation places (19th and 20th positions) and one relegation play-off (18th position in NASL Premier vs versus the promotion playoff winner in NASL2).
  • NASL2 would be split into two conferences, East and West. These conferences would play only teams in their conference during the regular season. The winner of each conference is automatically promoted to NASL Premier. There would be a playoff between the second place team in each conference. The winner of the playoff would play the 18th team in NASL Premier in a promotion/relegation playoff game for a chance at promotion.
  • NASL2 would relegate to NASL3, which is regionalized into four conferences. NASL3 is also where NASL Premier/NASL2 reserve teams would play, though they are not eligible for the promotion playoffs. NASL2 Eastern and Western conferences would re-align each year based on teams that are promoted and relegated. Clubs located nearest to the Mississippi River could shift from East to West in a given year to keep 12 teams per NASL2 conference. The worst finishers in the East and West Conferences would be relegated. A relegation playoff for NASL2 would take place at the end of the season with the second-to-last team in the East playing the second worst team in the West… loser plays the third-best NASL3 team in a relegation playoff. The worst teams in each of the four NASL3 divisions could be candidates to relegate to the NPSL, playing off against the four regional champions from that league.
In general, there would likely have to be minimum standards a team needs to meet in order to be eligible for promotion to a higher division. If a team cannot meet those, the next-best eligible team would take their place in either automatic promotion or promotion playoffs.

Play By USSF’s Rules Or Go In A Different Direction?

NASL has been open about a long term pursuit of first division status with the USSF.  Bill Peterson told the Cosmos Country Podcast, “The conversations are happening …. What we’re exploring to get is — the history of those policies and procedures, why they were put in place – is this something that still makes sense today?  Or does something else make sense?  Because the landscape for professional soccer has changed so much since those days when that was instituted and maybe it’s not the best thing.  If it is the best thing, then how does it work for everybody on an equitable basis, and doesn’t work in a way that would somehow restrict a league’s ability to grow.”

The USSF enjoys a cozy relationship with MLS.  The national federation and the country’s official first division are business partners in Soccer United Marketing, the group that sells TV rights for the national teams and MLS as a bundled package.  USSF’s Twitter account frequently references MLS.  Last year, NASL threatened a lawsuit over a proposal to raise the USSF’s first division standards to a level that seemed designed to prevent any challenge to MLS.

USSF’s division sanctioning influences a league’s ability to participate in the US Open Cup and therefore the CONCACAF Champions League berth that goes to the winner of that tournament.  While the Americas Champions League could offer a different path to (inter)continental glory, there is not an alternative to the Open Cup itself.  The opportunity presented by the domestic cup tournament each year for NASL clubs to test themselves against competition from MLS and USL is one of the highlights of the soccer calendar.  To continue to participate in the Cup, NASL will want to maintain some level of official sanctioning with USSF for each of its tiers.

However, if USSF sanctions USL as a second division, at some point NASL might consider not worrying about where USSF sanctions it in the division rankings as long as it is sanctioned. The price to pay would be a few extra Open Cup matches due to lower seeding in that tournament.  If the USSF shapes the landscape around the needs of MLS, NASL could opt to play by those rules only insofar as its teams qualify for the Open Cup and seek the Americas Champions League, whose driving force is Miami FC owner Riccardo Silva, as the vehicle to present itself internationally as a top league regardless of where USSF places it.

Can North America Support Two League Systems?

The combined population of the United States of America and Canada is over 350 million.  The European Union’s population is just over 500 million.  It is not unreasonable to suggest that the US and Canada could support two league systems, one run by MLS and USL and the other by NASL.  Bill Peterson told the Cosmos Country Podcast that he does not think of the success of his league and that of Major League Soccer as mutually exclusive:  “First of all, we’re not challenging MLS.  We’ve got a territory of 400 million people.  We believe both leagues can succeed at a very high level.

 There are more than enough fans, more than enough territories, more than enough cities, so we don’t look at it as a competition with them.”

The North American territory may or may not be big enough to support two systems, but in order to thrive NASL needs to do a better job differentiating itself against the system MLS and USL are developing.  Building up to incorporate promotion and relegation would be one way to do that, as would encouraging supporter ownership in clubs.

The MLS-USL system offers soccer fans in this country a proven model that has allowed the USA’s other major team sports leagues to become huge businesses.  However, NASL has the opportunity to implement a system that looks more like what we see in most of the rest of the world.  It’s a model that offers meaningful soccer to fans in more metro areas across North America. Instead of the top division being limited to the top 28-30 markets like in the NFL, MLB, NBA and NHL, promotion and relegation allows the chance for cities across the continent to experience the glory of a top level league championship, the nerve wracking drama of a relegation battle or an adventure in an international tournament.  The American style sports league answer to that is to allow close to 50% of the league’s teams into a postseason playoff tournament that undermines the value of winning the regular season.  We already get that from those other four major team sports leagues.  Wouldn’t it be nice to get something different from soccer?  The USA alone has 53 markets over one million in population.  The United Kingdom has 13. Surely each of those 53 metro markets deserves a chance to see a soccer team representing its area compete at the top of the sport in this continent?
Jon Marthaler of the Star Tribune summed up a similar sentiment:
If they aren’t careful, soccer’s minor leagues will go the way of baseball. [Noted baseball historian Bill] James described minor league baseball this way: “Great cities drawing a couple of hundred fans a game, pennant races with no meaning, no connection between city and player, player and fan, fan and city.” That’s not what any pro soccer fan wants for his local team, but it’s the way that lower-division soccer may be heading.
Don Garber, Jonathan Kraft and Joe Roth might be right; perhaps Americans wouldn’t like a system where their team could be rewarded for success and punished for failure by moving up and down divisions. The way things look today, it is very likely that the MLS-USL model will win out and top level soccer will be limited to only 28-30 markets rather than be allowed to develop in a way where it is open to all. But it sure would be fun to see the NASL and some lower league teams work together to give something different a shot.  NASL has a lot of housekeeping to get in order before it is ready for this, as outlined above.  However, if they can solidify around a core of strong teams, establish best practices that current and new clubs follow, assist lower league teams with an incubator system to help them grow and put together a differentiated league model that offers the American soccer audience something MLS-USL cannot, those cocksure “owners of soccer” just might get surprised.

Implementing a successful, alternative model to MLS’s dominance over the sport in this country will take a lot of work, but if a core of strong NASL owners band together and make progress, they could find some of their peers who own independent teams in USL knocking on their door in a few years when it becomes clear there will be no path to MLS for their club.  It is a battle against the odds right now, but that can change with a strong differentiated vision, persistence and determination.



Sunday, October 16, 2016

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Future Of US Club Soccer At A Crossroads: Part One – USL’s Second Division Ambitions & The Consolidation of US Soccer Under MLS

(by Chris Kivlehan midfieldpress.com 08-16)
The present divisional hierarchy of US pro soccer came about as a result of a schism between the United Soccer Leagues and a group of team owners that came to be known as the Team Owner’s Association.  Unhappy with the sale of USL by Nike to NuRock Holdings, the TOA formed the new North American Soccer League as an alternative to USL. There was contention over which league would be sanctioned as US Soccer’s official second division. After a season shared by clubs from both leagues in an United States Soccer Federation-forced joint venture called USSF D2, the federation determined that NASL would proceed as the country’s second division and USL would be the third division.  These “Soccerwarz” are chronicled in a book by that name, by Kartik Krishnaiyer, who served as the communications director for the NASL during that period. Like many wars before it, the resolution of that conflict planted the seeds of the next one.

Fast forward a little more than half a decade and a greatly expanded United Soccer League (minus the “s”) is petitioning the USSF for D2 status.  USL commissioner Jake Edwards expects a decision from the federation soon.  “We’re hoping to hear in the next few weeks,” Edwards told WVXU. “They’re wrapping up their due diligence. They’re sending folks out to our teams now; they’re inspecting some of our clubs. They’re spending time with our owners. They’ve got a few more weeks of due diligence to go and then we’re hoping to hear in the next month or so.”

The decision by the USSF will be a landmark one, either way they call it.  Their decision will set a precedent as to whether the nation can have two professional leagues operating at the same divisional tier on the so-called national pyramid.  If they decide USL can be Division 2 alongside NASL, in theory then NASL could one day be Division 1 alongside MLS, so long as it survives and thrives to meet the D1 standards.  If they decide against sanctioning USL as D2, it could cement the three pro leagues into their current levels for the foreseeable future.

It is easy to imagine that the North American Soccer League did not make any friends at USSF with their lawsuit threat regarding Division 1 status.  The contrast between USL’s D2 discussions with USSF and the status of NASL’s D1 discussions is stark when you hear the leagues’ respective commissioners talk.  While Edwards was filled with optimism regarding USL’s D2 application process, NASL commissioner Bill Peterson spoke in more cautious tones to the Cosmos Country Podcast about NASL’s D1 bid, “It has been a busy time for everybody the last couple months with Copa and everything else.  We haven’t talked about it in a while but we will this summer and we’ll continue to do that.  What we’re exploring to get is — the history of those policies and procedures, why they were put in place – is this something that still makes sense today?  Or does something else make sense?  Because the landscape for professional soccer has changed so much since those days when that was instituted and maybe it’s not the best thing.  If it is the best thing, then how does it work for everybody on an equitable basis, and doesn’t work in a way that would somehow restrict a league’s ability to grow.”

USL certainly has some outstanding success stories, but the USSF will need to look at the league as whole when determining where it ought to sit in the national pyramid rather than just examining the USL’s upper echelon clubs like FC Cincinnati, Louisville City FC and Sacramento Republic FC.  They must also look at the clubs who are struggling.  And then there is the matter of the MLS reserve teams.  The USSF must weigh heavily whether they want MLS reserve teams in the second division.
Reserve Teams In The Second Division?
Reserve teams are handled differently across the top soccer nations in the world. The English leagues do not have any reserve teams in their official pyramid.  There is a separate reserve league system for them.  The German leagues permit reserve teams in their official pyramid but reserve teams are not allowed to play above the third division.  The Spanish leagues will allow reserve teams to be promoted as high as the second division.  USSF must decide where it feels reserve teams must top off.  In a country as large as the United States, with so many metropolitan areas capable of supporting clubs at the D2 level, it would seem an odd choice for the USSF to allow reserve teams in the second division.

If they decide to bar reserve teams from the second division, USSF will also need to determine where the line is that makes a club a reserve team for MLS.  USL currently has five types of clubs:
  1. Fully independent teams, such as San Antonio FC
  2. Independent teams with an MLS affiliation in which players are loaned, such as OKC Energy
  3. Teams where the business operations are run independently but the soccer operations are run by an MLS team, such as Rio Grande Valley and soon to be Reno 1868
  4. Reserve teams that play under their own brand in a different market.  Only Bethlehem Steel FC qualifies today
  5. Full blown MLS reserve teams in the same market as the parent, such as NYRB II or LA Galaxy II
For the sake of limiting participation in D2, USSF could choose to draw the line between Type-2 and Type-3, Type-3 and Type-4 or Type-4 and Type-5.  The Portland Timbers interest in starting a second USL team based in Boise may point to a future where, similar to Minor League Baseball, MLS teams have multiple affiliated clubs across division levels.

NASL Commissioner Bill Peterson articulated the reserve team concern well in an interview with Empire of Soccer.  “To me, there are championship leagues, reserve leagues, and amateur leagues. You are one of the three. You are either playing for trophies, playing to develop players, or playing for the love of the game. We are a championship league. We play for trophies. [USL] have developed a league where they are, in my opinion, a reserve league, and that is where they are having success — and rightfully so. I think it is great for the game, great for MLS, great for the players to get a chance to be in a development system, but it is completely a different model from what we do.”

“At some point, the Federation needs to realize what [USL] have assembled is a reserve league,” Peterson continued. “The majority of the teams are reserve teams for MLS. I think it is a wonderful model for MLS, but let’s stop kidding ourselves about what it is. It’s a reserve league.”

In truth, USL is a hybrid of a reserve league and a championship league, and to be suitable for the next level up, they may need to alter the very formula that is driving their success.
The Louisville Case
While the current USL system makes it easy for new franchises to join, it may be chaffing against the ambitions of some of the league’s top clubs.  USL insiders also see change in the cards for the league to grow in a way that allows its upper echelon clubs to maximize their potential.  Louisville City FC president Amanda Duffy suggested to the Louisville Courier-Journal that a culling of weak clubs from the top level of USL could be in the league’s best interest, ”I think there will be a point where some of the organizations will be forced to make decisions,” Duffy said. “And in my opinion, I think we’ll see continued evolution of this sport at the Division 2 and Division 3 levels. Expectations and operating expenses will go up for some of the current organizations and there will be a point where the revenues just don’t match those operating expenses.”

Duffy sees several advantages to Louisville City being able to stake a claim as a second tier club going forward.  “I don’t think we have lost anything by saying we’re Division 3 and I don’t know that we gain anything by saying we’re Division 2,” Duffy said. “But I do think just from the elevation standpoint, it will help us with corporate partners and at the community level. There are selling points we will be able to use to our advantage.”

In a club soccer pyramid that was less dysfunctional than the one we have in the United States, the obvious answer might be for Louisville City to join the actual second tier league, NASL, especially since the long term prospects of Louisville for MLS look unlikely.  However, the club seems committed to the path of taking USL to D2 status.  Louisville chairman Wayne Estopinal told the Courier-Journal that NASL approached his team about switching leagues but LCFC turned them down.  “The USL is strong,” Estopinal said. “Anybody can beat anybody else any night of the week. I respect what the NASL is doing. I know some of the owners. They’ve approached me if there’s any interest. (But) Why would I leave a league that I think is stronger?”

The Nashville Case

One fluke year in the Open Cup notwithstanding, it is difficult to argue that USL teams are as strong on the field as NASL clubs top to bottom. Still, the league certainly features several clubs that could hold their own in Division 2.  A less hyperbolic interpretation of Estopinal’s sentiment would be to read it as meaning the USL has a stronger business model than NASL.  Certainly, the explosion of growth in the USL demonstrates the league is attracting more investors than NASL.
The primary driver of the USL’s appeal over NASL for investors is lower operating costs. Two key factors driving that are reduced travel costs due to regional play afforded by the quantity of teams in the league, and the potential for an MLS affiliation to provide a club with an infusion of resources from outside.

A few months prior to their announcement as a new USL franchise, I spoke with Nashville FC’s Chris Jones about how he saw the choice between NASL and USL as the leaders of Nashville FC evaluated pro options. “Both leagues have strengths,” Jones said.  “NASL has some good brands and ownership groups with deep pockets.  They are modeling it like a European league.  All good things.  The USL has the connection with MLS which is a huge feather in their cap.  By and large it seems less expensive to operate a USL club than a NASL club.  The lower costs of the USL are attractive. In an ideal world we wouldn’t have to pick and could work our way up through the leagues, but we aren’t there yet as a country and soccer federation.”

Jones’ statement that teams should be able to work their way up through the leagues is so simple and obvious yet so far away from the truth of the present situation in US club soccer. It is not only that the USSF “pyramid” lacks promotion and relegation, but it also lacks any real cooperation between NASL and the other two leagues.  A team like Louisville that may have reached its potential in D3 should move up to D2.  A better functioning model would see successful USL teams advance to NASL before MLS, and struggling NASL teams drop down to USL.

The San Antonio Case

The partnership between MLS and USL makes sense for both leagues on a lot of levels.  The reserve teams and affiliates in the league allow MLS teams to develop talent better.  It is a way for owners of USL teams to reduce expenses and showcase future MLS stars, similar to the model of minor league baseball.  However somewhere along the way Division 3 become the preferred path to Division 1, bypassing Division 2.

Years ago the San Antonio Spurs acquired the rights to a USL franchise in the Alamo City.  They were beaten to market by Gordon Hartman’s San Antonio Scorpions, a NASL club with an unique business model.  The profits of the Scorpions went to support Morgan’s Wonderland, an amusement park for special needs children run by Hartman.  After four successful seasons, Hartman sold Toyota Field, the Scorpions’ expandable stadium, to San Antonio city and Bexar County.  The Scorpions ceased operations, clearing the way for the Spurs-owned San Antonio FC to launch in USL, playing out of Toyota Field.

The beautiful part of the San Antonio soccer story is that Hartman was able to turn his Scorpions investment into a win for a more noble cause.  That is certainly the bigger picture in that story.  However, in the less important picture of US club soccer structure, the case demonstrates the bizarre triangle existing between MLS, NASL and USL.  Ever since the Scorpions debuted to impressive crowds in NASL, San Antonio had been a vocal candidate for MLS expansion.  The Spurs/San Antonio FC ownership intends to accelerate those efforts.  They could have easily acquired the rights to the Scorpions in NASL and demonstrated their suitability for the big leagues in the second division.  Instead they decided to enter San Antonio FC into third tier USL.  Shouldn’t owners with ambitions of D1 be placing their teams in D2?  The answer would be yes, in a system that is not as dysfunctional as the one we have now.  The reality is that a club like FC Cincinnati, which is an obvious MLS attempt in major league media market, chooses USL over NASL today, because of the partnership between USL and MLS.

What D2 May Look Like In a MLS-USL Model

MLS owners are not interested in promotion and relegation.  Jonathan Kraft of the New England Revolution summed the MLS stance on pro/rel at BlazerCon last year:  “This soccer league is in the United States. The United States is about having top tier teams in all their sports and then there are minor leagues to support all those sports. That’s what works in this country and in this culture.”
In case you think Kraft might be alone in this view, have a quote from Joe Roth of the Seattle Sounders: “Americans like winners. They’re addicted to winners. I think that if the Premier League started today, I don’t think they’d have relegation.”

Don Garber further signaled MLS leadership’s alignment against pro/rel with this comment, “Promotion and relegation was created in the 1800s. It was a system that existed because there was no other way that existed to create good competition. They were amateur teams. If you were to create professional football in England or Italy or Spain today, I don’t believe you’d have promotion and relegation. We need to create a league that works for the fan base in this market.

“Nobody looks at the NFL and says it’s not working because there’s no promotion and relegation. If you’re investing billions and billions of dollars, which we are now at about $3.5 billion invested [in MLS] in twenty years, to build something in Kansas City and they have a shitty season, to think they might be playing in Chattanooga in a stadium of 4,000 people on a crappy field with no fans, makes no sense.”

So let’s be clear, promotion and relegation involving MLS is not happening.  With MLS at the top level, USL to support it as a minor league, and PDL below that at a widespread regional level to develop local talent, you can see the system Kraft envisions coalescing.  There is no place for NASL in that vision.

In that MLS-centric vision, USL proceeding into D2 status makes some sense. Even if you subscribe to that world view, there are serious questions as to whether USL in its current form warrants D2 status.  To build off of what Louisville president Amanda Duffy suggested above, USL may need to either cull the herd or split into two tiers, one D2 and one D3, in order to create a D2 league that makes sense.  The USL had two tiers during the 2000s, prior to the USL/TOA split, known as USL-1 and USL-2, so it would not be the first time this has happened.

A respectable USL-D2 league could consist of Sacramento Republic FC, FC Cincinnati, Louisville City FC, San Antonio FC, OKC Energy, Richmond Kickers, Rochester Rhinos, Colorado Switchbacks, Arizona United, Charlotte Independence, Saint Louis FC and the Tulsa Roughnecks.  As a consequence of their elevation to D2, those clubs would also lose the reduced travel benefits of today’s large, regionalized USL.  It is also worth noting that half of these teams are open about ambitions to move to MLS. USL-D2 serves as an incubator for MLS, until MLS decides it is finally done expanding, which will likely happen when MLS reaches 32 teams.  Then USL-D2 becomes the top available landing spot for a club in the MLS-USL system.

As a Sacramento or St Louis moves on from USL-D2, a Nashville FC or other independent team in a market that meets D2 standards needs to be ready to step in to keep the number of teams respectable.  This may not be an issue, as USL appears to be aggressively targeting expansion to the largest remaining markets without pro soccer.  NBC reported that a San Diego USL team is in the works, while reports suggest that the small market Wilmington Hammerheads will be taking 2017 off as the team’s ownership looks into relocation to a larger market, rumored to be Baltimore.

If the top USL clubs were to ascend to a USL-D2, USL-D3 could remain a division below it featuring the reserve teams alongside the weaker independent clubs that Duffy suggests may have trouble keeping up with the increased standards that the stronger clubs introduce. With the weaker independents and the reserve teams in one league, USL-D3 should be able to remain highly regionalized to keep up the lower travel costs that is one of the attractive selling points of USL today.  
Below USL-D3, USL’s Premier Development league could continue to play the role it plays today fostering amateur and semi-pro talent in markets across the country.  Just as Nashville FC is stepping up from the fourth division NPSL to USL, FC Tucson and Albuquerque Sol FC are looking to make the leap from PDL to USL (D3) in the coming years.  Coupled with strong academy programs, a pyramid consisting of MLS, USL-D2, USL-D3 and PDL gives MLS and USL a complete talent and market development system akin to the partnership between Major League and Minor League Baseball.

What Would USL-D2 Mean For NASL?

USL’s ascent to second division status would put the North American Soccer League in a precarious position.  With its D1 ambitions, NASL has set itself up as a potential rival and threat to MLS, and MLS has proceeded in forming its major league-minor league system without NASL accordingly.  Should NASL not be able to compete and survive, that will not be MLS’s problem.

The NASL has three things going for it: sole D2 status, lower expansion fees than MLS and operating policies that allow owners greater control over their club and brands than MLS owners have.  In this scenario, NASL would lose one of its three advantages. The recent news that MLS is planning to raise its expansion fee to over $200 million will benefit NASL as the pool of potential investors able to pay MLS’s price gets smaller. As for the other advantage, the greater freedom also comes with greater responsibility in terms of each club mapping out its own success.  A NASL club can go out and spend whatever money it wants to build a team, as Miami FC has done this year, but it also must figure out its own path from a marketing perspective, for better or worse.

The threat a strong USL-D2 would pose to NASL would be the potential for clubs to defect.  This might be particularly appealing to those ownership groups with eyes on one of the likely last eight MLS berths.  The Carolina Railhawks or Indy Eleven may feel their MLS chances are greater playing ball in USL-D2 than continuing in an adversarial NASL.

Should USL’s rise to D2 become a killing blow to NASL, NASL clubs that wish to keep going would for the most part be welcomed into USL.  An exception to that might be the New York Cosmos, who would have to buy out Red Bull and join MLS through acquisition or return to the history books.  Similarly, Riccardo Silva would have to decide if Miami FC is a worthwhile pursuit in that paradigm; Silva might have to choose between joining Beckham’s MLS group or moving on.  Rayo OKC is also unlikely to find itself welcome in USL due to the presence of the OKC Energy.  The ownership might have to choose between relocating or ceasing operations. Short of those three clubs, all other NASL teams could likely live on in some form in USL.  In the case of the Ottawa Fury and FC Edmonton, moving to the Canadian Premier League, should it materialize, would make more sense than USL.

USL getting official D2 sanctioning is a mortal threat to NASL.  The NASL would need to respond by creating an alternative to the MLS-USL structure that is compelling enough to attract new investors and the many soccer fans in North America that may not embrace MLS today.  In Part II of this article, we will look at how NASL could create a promotion-relegation pyramid structure independent of MLS and USL, to offer US soccer fans a worthwhile alternative to the closed system MLS and USL are developing together.-